Upd - Ssis951mp4

Hi all,

I'm using ST's CubeMX implementation on a F4 discovery board. I use ST's USB middlewares with FreeRTOS.

When I get a special OutputReport from PC side I have to answer nearly immediately (in 10-15 ms). Currently I cannot achieve this timing and it seems my high priority tasks can interrupt the USB callback. What do you think, is it possible? Because it's generated code I'm not sure but can I increase the priority of the USB interrupt (if there is any)?

Thank you, David

10 to 15 ms is very slow, so I'm sure its possible.

Where is the USB callback function called from? If it is an interrupt then it cannot be interrupted by high priority RTOS tasks. Any non interrupt code (whether you are using an RTOS or not) can only run if no interrupts are running.

Without knowing the control flow in your application its hard to know what to suggest. How is the OutputReport communicated to you? By an interrupt, a message from another task, or some other way?

The callback which receive the data from PC is called from the OTGFSIRQHandler (it's the part of the HALPCDIRQHandler function). I think the problem is SysTickHandler's priority is higher than OTGFSIRQHandler and it's cannot be modified, but the scheduler shouldn't interrupt the OTGFSIRQHandler with any task handled by the scheduler. Am I wrong that the scheduler can interrupt the OTGFS_IRQHandler?

In time, they learned to share the small things. Mara would reach for a mug and find her hand guided by a memory that wasn't hers; 951 would laugh from somewhere behind her temple at jokes she hadn't yet heard. They argued about details—what color a sweater had been, whether the rain had been cold—and the arguments patched holes in both of them.

Integration complete. The file is saved. But when you hit play, the image still flickers at the exact moment you tried to say goodbye. Business Trip With Female Boss SSIS-951 | Saika Kawakita

The number one risk when searching for specific video files (especially those containing product codes) is security. Fake "updaters" and malicious executables often hide behind popular search terms.

The keyword typically points toward a very specific niche: the world of high-definition digital media archives and software-driven content updates. While it looks like a string of technical jargon, it represents a common intersection of media identification codes and the search for the latest "updated" (upd) versions of digital files. Decoding the Keyword

To ensure the best playback experience, use the following parameters with tools like H.265 (HEVC)

| Problem | Probable Cause | Solution | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | File won't play | Corrupt header/update | Use MP4Fix or Untrunc to rebuild the header | | Audio out of sync | Incorrect muxing during update | Remux with FFmpeg: ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -map 0 -c copy -async 1 fixed.mp4 | | Subtitles missing | Update stripped subtitles | Extract subs from old file: ffmpeg -i old.mp4 -map 0:s:0 subs.srt | | File is actually an .exe | Malware disguised as video | Delete immediately. Run a full antivirus scan. |

Thank you for the answer, I think I'm a bit confused with the Cortex ISR priorities :-) What I can observe is if I use a much higher osDelay in my high priority task I can respond for the received USB message much faster. This is why I think tasks can mess up with my OTG interrupt.