Fukuyamaev rad je provokativan i stimulativan: dok je prepoznao veliki istorijski pomak posle Hladnog rata, mnogi događaji poslednjih decenija doveli su u pitanje njegov optimizam. Ipak, knjiga je i dalje obavezno štivo za razumevanje savremenih debata o liberalizmu, identitetu i geopolitici.
Fukuyama updated this for the 20th century: the “universal and homogenous state” predicted by Kojève was, in practice, modern Western liberal democracy. frensis fukuyama kraj istorije i poslednji covek pdf 17
The Serbian edition is titled . It was published in Belgrade in the 1990s (most notably by "Plato" or similar publishing houses during the post-socialist transition period). The book holds significant relevance in the region, as its theories were often debated during the breakup of Yugoslavia and the subsequent transition to democracy. Fukuyamaev rad je provokativan i stimulativan: dok je
This paper examines a critical passage from Francis Fukuyama’s The End of History and the Last Man (1989/1992), focusing on the arguments presented on of the Serbian/Latin edition (PDF reference). It analyzes how Fukuyama operationalizes Hegel’s concept of recognition ( Anerkennung ) to argue that liberal democracy represents the endpoint of mankind’s ideological evolution. The paper critiques the deterministic logic found on this page and evaluates its relevance 30+ years later. The Serbian edition is titled
While PDF versions of classic texts often circulate on the internet, copyright laws generally apply to translations. To ensure you are accessing a high-quality, legal version, consider the following options:
Fukuyama’s dilemma:
Note: If you are a student or researcher who needs a specific passage from page 17 or chapter 17 of the Serbian translation, I recommend checking a library database or contacting the publisher (probably “Plato” or “Geopoetika” for the Serbian edition). If you have access to a legitimate PDF, use the search function to locate “17.”