Despite the rise of rights rhetoric, the law remains stubbornly rooted in welfare . Legally, animals are still property. However, cracks are forming:
The core of animal rights is the rejection of —the assumption of human superiority used to justify the exploitation of other species. Whether it’s ending the use of animals in cosmetic testing, transitioning away from animal-based agriculture, or banning animals in circuses, the goal is total liberation and the legal recognition of their right to exist for their own sake. Why It Matters Now sex bestiality zoo horse young indian woman with horsempg
The animal rights position, most famously articulated by philosopher Tom Regan (The Case for Animal Rights) and legal scholar Gary Francione, argues that animals are not property. They are "subjects-of-a-life" with inherent value. Using an animal for human purposes—no matter how "humanely" you treat it—is a violation of that animal's right to bodily autonomy and life. Despite the rise of rights rhetoric, the law